| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Inkarr Hashur
Sine Nobilitatis
270
   |
Posted - 2013.03.21 18:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
"-Legion will work, but range is terribad"
Just sit on a spawn point, sleepers usually approach you anyway. Its a mid-range ship, its not like its using blasters. Terribad isn't the word I'd choose. |
Inkarr Hashur
Sine Nobilitatis
270
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
I can't see a reason why a 100MN legion fit wouldn't work in an anom. Decent damage, range is ok due to its speed countering webs, can't dual rep but one works fine for anoms, very strong capacitor. |
Inkarr Hashur
Sine Nobilitatis
270
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
There's only one site I'd be hesitant to throw a 1B legion at, and its the 1400 DPS grav site with lots of neuting. And I think if one were to spend a little bit more, and pop an exile booster it would do fine. |
Inkarr Hashur
Sine Nobilitatis
270
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
Helene Chenal wrote:Inkarr Hashur wrote:Edit: actually no, I'd still hesitate on the 1400 DPS site. Looking back at pyfa the 1B figure was just my bad memory at work. I'd put isk on an oruze nesting out a laser rep legion. Easily. I don't think it could tank most c3 mags either.
You'd lose the ISK then because I solo oruze without capping out. Now, did I do it leaving one of my reps off? I can't remember. I know I don't even need both for that low DPS site. Anyway I haven't even upgraded my cap control circuit yet. Its really not that big a deal. |
Inkarr Hashur
Sine Nobilitatis
270
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Helene Chenal wrote:Inkarr Hashur wrote:Helene Chenal wrote:Inkarr Hashur wrote:Edit: actually no, I'd still hesitate on the 1400 DPS site. Looking back at pyfa the 1B figure was just my bad memory at work. I'd put isk on an oruze nesting out a laser rep legion. Easily. I don't think it could tank most c3 mags either. You'd lose the ISK then because I solo oruze without capping out. Now, did I do it leaving one of my reps off? I can't remember. I know I don't even need both for that low DPS site. Anyway I haven't even upgraded my cap control circuit yet. Its really not that big a deal. Good point, I forgot how little DPS that site does. You're pretty stable with only one repper running. Doesn't help OP though - unless he gets the isk for a T3. Knowing OP personally, I'd say logging on and participating in group isk making might have solved that problem.
My goal is Frontier database http://eve-survival.org/wikka.php?wakka=UnsecuredFrontierDatabase
I think I'll have to put that one mag site on the shelf until I know more about my ship's limits. And my willingness to invest in my ship. |
Inkarr Hashur
Sine Nobilitatis
280
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 19:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lenier Chenal wrote:Derath Ellecon wrote:Lenier Chenal wrote:Derath Ellecon wrote:Helene Chenal wrote:You'd be better off in a tech 2 blaster Hyperion IMHO
So far all of your advise in this thread has been just bad. You should just stop. You've even admitted you haven't even run C3 sites in forever. And not since the neut change. Advising someone to run c3s solo is the original bad piece of advice. You should stop being a scrub. I've ran them since the neut change, but not since the cap battery change - I use fully passive ships when not cap escalating anyways. I personally have solo'd c3s in a Hyperion, without issues. The guy above me must suck with drone skills. His domi fit is going to get him killed someday, far sooner than using the Hyperion. I don't see many in this thread advising anyone to run solo. The OP asked about ships that can solo. I even linked a KM to show a fit that CAN run solo fine, but also to illustrate it is a gank waiting to happen. learn2read. You must not know Roime. I'm sure his drone skills are fine. And he can afford to lose that domi. You could lose 2 of those domis for the price of 1.5 Hyperion hulls. And there is no need for a fully passive fit in a C3 or a C4 for that matter. I don't think anyone soloing c3s is hurt by the isk loss as a result of a gank, perhaps the KM though.
You say this while in your previous post call someone a scrub for answering a simple question posed by OP about sololing C3 content, and then in that very same post wave your e-peen about soloing C3 content in a hyperion. So...you're the scrub? I can't even figure out what you are trying to say or prove. I'll just remind you no one is ever impressed by e-peen waving.
|
Inkarr Hashur
Sine Nobilitatis
291
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 19:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
You can easily fit a 100MN afterburner on a legion, anyone ever try sites that way? To maintain decent speed under webs, or to get into orbit around a sleeper BS and avoid most of the DPS on the field. I realize this is what the HAM subsystem is more suited to but I want to see if one could at least attempt to do it with pulse, and just turn off the AB when needed. I'd go and test it myself but the test server still hasn't mirrored. |
Inkarr Hashur
Sine Nobilitatis
299
|
Posted - 2013.04.01 14:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lenier Chenal wrote:Inkarr Hashur wrote:
You say this while in your previous post call someone a scrub for answering a simple question posed by OP about sololing C3 content, and then in that very same post wave your e-peen about soloing C3 content in a hyperion. So...you're the scrub? I can't even figure out what you are trying to say or prove. I'll just remind you no one is ever impressed by e-peen waving.
Laughinggirls.jpg
Oh hey somehow I missed this.
Coolmemearrows.gif.tif.png |
| |
|